🎵 Per my previous post about Mute Math, anyone across these sites remember Earthsuit?
🎵 Per my previous post about Mute Math, anyone across these sites remember Earthsuit?
Test
Currently listening: Mute Math’s self-titled album still hits. 🎵
Yokohama-e (literally “Yokohama pictures”) are a type of Japanese woodblock print depicting the foreigners who flooded through Yokohama during the 1860s and 70s, in particular North Americans: https://buff.ly/2eSwcac
![]()
“The ability to spy on us is being sold to much bigger players, and to me, that’s another indication of the cameras need to come down,” Diaz said. “The whole point of Flock is that it’s a network, and the more people you have in the network, the more people you have accessing and using it, the stronger it gets.”
Flock is using the same strategy as Facebook used to entice and then lock-in an entire generation of social media users, but instead of starting with “I wonder what my old college roommate is up to” it’s “how much government surveillance can we subject you” to. U.S. residents are the product, not the clients of these sorts of tools.
Ryan Broderick wondering about the future of the film industry in Garbage Day:
Where do all the actors go? And where will the actors of the future come from? Acting is actually the art form that has struggled the most in the age of online video. (I have a red hot take that allowing audiences to film live theater the way they do concerts would blast the doors open on this, but I’ll spare you.) Unfortunately, history doesn’t really help us find an answer here. For the last few years, I’ve assumed the current entertainment landscape was an echo of the early 20th century. When vaudeville performers moved to short-form nickelodeons before eventually getting snapped up by Hollywood studios for silent films and eventually talkies. I figured that the stars of the future were currently grinding it out on TikTok and other derivative video platforms and would reinvigorate Hollywood when they finally “graduated” to more serious productions. What’s actually happening is far stranger. The unchecked tech-media monopolies of the second Trump era have realized you can make more money building perpetual and personalized slop machines than trying to create large-scale mass appeal entertainment. Instead of investing in films that stand the test of time, they’ve fully leaned into the death loop of streaming, where the past has no value beyond determining the algorithmic bucket you’re slotted into for the next pull of the feed. And they’re desperate for a future without writers or actors or anyone they have to pay..
Thinking about reorganizing my @micro.blog site categories. Any advice from older hands around here I should consider before embarking?
Currently reading: Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism by George Marsden 📚
Here’s a quote that provides some insight into why a subset of silicon valley moguls are starting to sound like the elders in the fundamentalist church of my adolescence:
Fundamentalist thought is in fact, highly suited to one strand of contemporary culture–the technological strand. Unlike theoretical science or social science, where questions of the supernatural raise basic issues about the presuppositions of the enterprise, technological thinking does not wrestle with such theoretical principles. Truth is a matter of true and precise propositions that, when properly classified and organized, will work. Fundamentalism fits this mentality because it is a form of Christianity with no loose ends, ambiguities, or historical developments. Everything fits neatly into a system. It is revealing, for instance, that many of the leaders of the creation – science movement are an applied sciences or engineering. (p. 119)
Do we use our tech products or do they use us:
Here is something nobody says plainly:
Sometime in the last twenty years, our possessions came alive.
Not all at once. Not dramatically. One by one, the objects in our lives opened their eyes, found our faces, and began to need us.
Spring Progress 📷 2026.03.16
March weather is a chaos gremlin.

#SP26.2
Here’s Bluesky’s interim CEO’s first week impressions.
🎩 tip to @matthewlang for the link.
Tim Wu making the argument for why social media should be handled like big tobacco:
But changing circumstances have undercut these arguments. For one thing, if the platforms in the 1990s and 2000s were passive carriers of others’ content (albeit filtered by human moderators), they are now active purveyors. The platforms use aggressive tactics to keep users compulsively engaged — algorithmic recommendations, infinite scroll, auto video play and intermittent reinforcement (in which likes, comments and refreshed content are rewarded unpredictably rather than consistently). This goes far beyond merely hosting and moderating third-party content.
The second change is the growing evidence of a correlation between the rise of social media and harm to young people.
I’ll be tracking the spring progression on our front maple tree. #SP26.1 📷
Here’s the Fall 2025 progression:









Winter still holds a grip in MI, but it’s loosening. Here’s a moment of calm from a recent neighborhood walk:
Remembering James Joseph Reeb today. Accountability has yet to come in regards to his murder. NPR produced an engrossing series on the legacy of his killing in Selma. It has me reflecting on Renee Good and Alex Pretti as well. The cost of advancing liberty and civil rights is high.
Come here quick!! Falling Frontier just dropped another gameplay trailer!
Warren Throckmorton reflecting on how Christian Nationalists use the historical record:
I don’t think it matters to someone who is determined to see what he wants to see in past events. If you’ve already determined what is happening in the present then the past must be a sign, no matter what the array of events.
You Bought Zuck’s Ray-Bans. Now Someone in Nairobi Is Watching You Poop.
Is the Macbook Neo an iPad killer? I use an iPad as a runabout with a Mac mini as my home mothership. The logic being that for tasks like reading, casual writing, or just cruising YouTube the iPad is a better form factor than my mothership. At the cost of a touch screen could Neo be a better form?
Reading Marsden again today and this passage has me thinking about all the “is revival happening” discourse in my feeds recently:
One other chief consequence of the lack of an institutional church base, and of the declining role of the traditional denominations, is that evangelicalism’s vaunted challenge to the secular culture becomes increasingly difficult to sustain. The movement depends on free enterprise and popular appeal. To some extent conservative churches grow because they promise certainty in times of uncertainty, and the name of the old-time gospel. Yet, with a few institutional restraints on what message may legitimately be proclaimed, the laws of the market invite mixes of the gospel with various popular appeals. So the evangelical challenges to the secular “modern mind“ are likely to be compromised by the innovative, oversimplifications and concessions to the popular spirit of the age. Hence, as is often the case in church history, the advance of the gospel is bound up with the advance of secularization within the church. Perhaps this conjunction is inevitable in a fallen world. The tares will grow with the wheat. (p. 82)
I think one can make an argument that the “spirit of our age” is fierce nationalism: we collectively define and then fiercely protect the borders/boundaries that cohesively give shape to whom we extend solidarity. The dynamic Marsden frames above is why I think conservative culture-warriors are so quick to align revival with their sociopolitical program. They see themselves as “gospel” guardians, but their gospel is more about appealing to a “god-and-country” milieu that will buy the arena tickets, books, advertised products that sponsor their content product, and register to vote for their preferred candidates. Tares and wheat indeed.
the days are getting longer:
Reading news coverage this morning and I keep thinking about George W Bush’s 2003 ‘Mission Accomplished’ speech, and everything that happened subsequently.
Robin Sloan arguing Artificial General Intelligence is already here while giving a big picture framing of the whole discourse around LLMs and their implications that I found pretty compelling:
The key word in Artificial General Intelligence is General. That’s the word that makes this AI unlike every other AI: because every other AI was trained for a particular purpose and, & even if it achieved it in spectacular fashion, did not do anything else. Consider landmark models across the decades: the Mark I Perceptron, LeNet, AlexNet, AlphaGo, AlphaFold … these systems were all different, but all alike in this way…
If you appeared in a puff of smoke before the authors of that paper, just after publication — a few months before half of them cleaved from OpenAI to form Anthropic — and carried with you a laptop linked through time to the big models of 2026, what would their appraisal be ? There’s no doubt in my mind they would say: Wow, we really did it ! This is obviously AGI!
…Pile up the tendencies: the Bay Area is the land of the overthinkers; a linguistic technology invites endless rumination about both language & intelligence; it’s more fun to define a cool new standard than go along with a boring old one; the feeling of every creative project, upon completion, is the same: It’s not quite how I imagined it … None of this should prevent us from using plain language to acknowledge an obvious capability.